“Doesn’t sort of just underscore how arbitrary it is?” says Dan Flynn, 25, an executive assistant living in Brookline. Not to mention those who’ve never taken astrology seriously in the first place. And Eugenia Last, whose internationally syndicated horoscope column appears in various publications, including the Globe, has no intention of tailoring her work to the new dates outlined by NASA (“Absolutely not,” she writes in an e-mail). Many fans have simply vowed to ignore it. Meanwhile, the shift doesn’t figure to make much - if any - impact in the world of popular astrology. “Did you recently hear that NASA changed the zodiac signs?” the headline reads. As a follow-up to its Space Place post, it took to Tumblr last week to set the record straight. However, the recent cosmic maelstrom, which has left disgruntled horoscope-readers directing much of their anger at NASA, has prompted the agency to clarify. “It’s in any astronomy book you can look it up anywhere.” “This has been completely known for centuries,” says Alan MacRobert, senior editor at Sky and Telescope magazine in Cambridge.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |